![]() He of course does not see that, having already dismissed that possibility. Even Nick Lane admits to the marvelous nanoengineering of the “highest order” involved, and that many see that as God’s hand. Everyone should read at least his “The Vital Question”. ![]() When I see Nick Lane say that, that will give me pause for thought. Nature got as far as RNA world but that ‘cannot adequately account for the emergence of an efficient RNA replicase or the translation system’. How does God explain that? Make that ‘simpler’? Explain anything? Nature has always existed, God or no. It does not matter that in just 70 years we haven’t formulated what nature did over seven million times longer in labs the length of oceans. ![]() There is no gap in it, nothing at the beginning in the temperate iron - you know, the stuff at the heart of ATP synthase - bearing olivine alkaline thermal vents doing (electro-)chemistry. ![]() These fallacies are all part of apologetic: God’s existence can be rationally proposed therefore don’t try and explain complexity.ĪTP synthase evolution over a hundred million years is no gap. The impossibly complex formulation of proteins to transport e-'s, reduce compounds, and then phosphorylate ADP seem to be both evidence for the hand of God as well as drawing a circle around where the arrow hit. Another fine use of the sharpshooter fallacy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |